sanskrit-teaching-methods-sa-l2 MCQ — 10 अभ्यास प्रश्न उत्तर सहित

Explanation

Both statements hold. NEP 2020's 5+3+3+4 structure does place Class 6-8 in the middle stage, and making the shared roots and word-order links between the learner's first language and Sanskrit explicit is precisely how a teacher turns a multilingual classroom into a resource rather than a barrier. The traps reject one or both true statements; only option D affirms both and correctly frames Statement 2 as a valid application of the NEP multilingual emphasis.

Explanation

Using direct, structural-situational, sutra and translation methods deliberately within one lesson, each for the purpose it serves best, is the eclectic or samuccaya method, whose principle is that no single method meets every objective. The traps each isolate one component as if it were the whole: pathasala is recitation only, translation is one brief step, and the sutra method only handles the rule. Only the eclectic method names the principled combination.

Explanation

The teacher helps Joseph do, with support, what he cannot yet do alone, then deliberately reduces the prompt from sentence starter to picture to nothing. That is Vygotsky's zone of proximal development operationalised through scaffolding that is gradually faded as competence grows. The traps reuse familiar theorist labels: Krashen's affective filter is anxiety, Piaget's formal-operational is a cognitive stage, and Chomsky's universal grammar is innate structure, none of which is the fading-support mechanism here.

Explanation

The teacher moves action and image first, then situational drill, then the symbolic paradigm rule. That is Bruner's enactive-iconic-symbolic progression and matches Piaget's point that concrete-operational learners need a concrete anchor before abstraction. The traps are sequence inversion (rule memorised before any example), a false syllabus prohibition on stating rules, and translation-method overuse. Only option C names the correct theorist-grounded sequence for this stage.

Explanation

The direct method builds meaning effectively through objects and action without first-language translation, but it is weak at stating abstract paradigms, which is exactly why a blended sequence brings in the sutra method once meaning is secure. The traps confuse methods: option C describes the translation method, option D borrows the pathasala recitation strength, and option A overstates the limit by denying that meaning is conveyed at all. Only option B names the real limitation and the corrective pairing.