97. Supreme Court, High Courts, Judicial Review, Activism, Virtual/E-Courts
सर्वोच्च न्यायालय, उच्च न्यायालय, न्यायिक समीक्षा, न्यायिक सक्रियता, आभासी/ई-अदालतेंCORE Key Points at a Glance
- 1
Supreme Court of India — Foundation
- Established 28 January 1950 under Articles 124–147
- Has original, appellate, and advisory jurisdiction
- Serves as final court of appeal and guardian of the Constitution
- 2
Judicial Review — Constitutional Basis
- Power of courts to examine constitutional validity of legislative and executive acts
- Implied under Article 13 (laws inconsistent with fundamental rights are void)
- Also under Article 32/226 (writ jurisdiction)
- Declared part of the Constitution's basic structure in Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973)
- 3
Judicial Activism and PIL — Origins
- Refers to proactive role of courts in protecting rights and enforcing governance obligations
- Most visible through Public Interest Litigation (PIL)
- Pioneered by Justice P.N. Bhagwati and Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer in the late 1970s
- 4
High Courts — Basic Facts
- Constituted under Articles 214–231
- India has 25 High Courts as of 2025
- Newest: Andhra Pradesh HC at Amaravati (established 2019)
- Each HC has original, appellate, and supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate courts
- 5
Five Writs — Articles 32 & 226
- Habeas Corpus — produce the body (protects against illegal detention)
- Mandamus — command to perform a legal duty
- Certiorari — quash inferior tribunal order
- Prohibition — stop inferior tribunal from exceeding jurisdiction
- Quo Warranto — by what authority do you hold this office?
- 6
Landmark SC Cases — Constitutional Milestones
- Shankari Prasad (1951) — Parliament can amend Fundamental Rights
- Golaknath (1967) — Parliament cannot amend Fundamental Rights
- Kesavananda Bharati (1973) — Basic Structure Doctrine established
- Maneka Gandhi (1978) — expanded Article 21 to include dignity
- Vishakha (1997) — sexual harassment at workplace guidelines
- 7
E-Courts Mission Mode Project — Three Phases
- Phase I (2007–2015): Computerisation of district and subordinate courts
- Phase II (2015–2023): NJDG, Case Management System, e-Filing, SMS alerts
- Phase III (2023–2027): Budget ₹7,210 crore — Digital Courts, Virtual Hearings, ICJS, paperless courts
- 8
Virtual Courts — COVID-19 and Beyond
- Introduced by the Supreme Court in March 2020 during COVID-19
- Over 24 lakh cases heard via virtual hearing by 2025
- FASTER system enables digital transmission of court orders to prisons and police
- 9
National Judicial Data Grid (NJDG)
- Provides real-time data on cases pending in all courts
- 4.4 crore pending cases as of early 2025
- Case Management System (CMS) tracks case progress
- e-Filing system enables digital submission of court petitions
- 10
Collegium System — Evolution
- Mechanism for appointing SC and HC judges
- Evolved through Three Judges Cases: S.P. Gupta (1982), SCAORA (1993), Re Presidential Reference (1998)
- NJAC Act (2015) struck down as violating judicial independence (basic structure)
- 11
Judicial Overreach — Concept
- Occurs when courts cross into legislative or executive domains
- Distinct from judicial activism
- Examples: micromanaging cricket governance (BCCI case), ordering pothole repairs, mandating speed governors
- Core exam theme: debate between judicial activism (rights protection) vs. judicial overreach (separation of powers)
- 12
Recent Significant SC Judgments
- Navtej Singh Johar v. UoI (2018) — decriminalised homosexuality (Section 377 IPC)
- Joseph Shine v. UoI (2018) — struck down adultery law
- Sabarimala (2018) — entry of women of all ages
- Electoral Bonds case (2024) — scheme declared unconstitutional
Sign up free to read more
Access all sections, predicted questions, and revision tables.
PREDICTED Predicted RAS Questions
Based on PYQ trends and 2026 syllabus analysis
1 5M What is judicial review? State its constitutional basis in India.
Model Answer
Judicial Review is the power of courts to examine the constitutional validity of legislative acts and executive orders, and strike them down if inconsistent with the Constitution. Its basis: Article 13 (laws violating Fundamental Rights are void), Article 32/226 (writ jurisdiction), and Article 131–136 (appellate jurisdiction). In Kesavananda Bharati (1973), the SC declared judicial review part of the basic structure — even constitutional amendments cannot remove it.
~50 words • 5 marks
Access all sections, predicted questions, and revision tables.
