Operation Sindoor MCQ — 30 Practice Questions with Answers

Explanation

The Government described Operation Sindoor as a punitive and targeted campaign, so the nature of the campaign matches that phrase. Its purpose was to dismantle terror infrastructure. Its geographic reach was across the Line of Control and deeper inside Pakistan. Any matching that treats geography as the nature of the campaign or treats dismantling infrastructure as the geographic reach misreads the official description.

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct because the briefing said India launched armed drones at four Pakistani air-defence sites. Statement 2 is correct because one drone destroyed an air-defence radar. Statement 3 is wrong because the cited fact concerns armed drones and air-defence sites, not missile strikes on naval facilities.

Explanation

The MEA briefing cited preliminary forensic reports linking the recovered debris to ASISGUARD SONGAR drones of Turkey. Bayraktar TB2 is another Turkish drone family, but it was not the system named in this briefing. CH-4 is associated with China, and Shahed-136 with Iran, so neither matches the cited forensic identification.

Explanation

The Assertion is true because the assigned fact states that BSF troops thwarted an infiltration attempt along the International Border in Samba district of Jammu and Kashmir and neutralised at least two infiltrators. The Reason is false because it shifts the location to the Line of Control in Rajouri district and denies the stated neutralisation.

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct because PIB stated that UAVs and small drones intruded into Indian civilian and military areas after the May 10 ceasefire understanding. Statement 2 is correct because those intrusions were successfully intercepted. Statement 3 is wrong because the sourced fact refers to civilian and military areas, not only maritime zones.