The Supreme Court on 27 April 2026 upheld the relocation of surplus spotted deer from Delhi's A N Jha Deer Park at Hauz Khas to wildlife reserves including Mukundra Hills Tiger Reserve and Ramgarh Vishdhari Tiger Reserve in Rajasthan. A bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta accepted the Central Empowered Committee's findings and directed time-bound translocation under scientific protocols. The case arose from a challenge by the New Delhi Nature Society against the relocation plan. The court allowed only up to 38 deer to remain in the park, subject to Central Zoo Authority approval and prescribed norms. The committee's March 6, 2026 report found that the deer enclosure covered about 10.26 acres and could sustainably support about 19 pairs, or around 38 deer, under zoo authority norms. It said the population had grown exponentially because of weak population control and poor compliance with zoo management standards. The court rejected the idea that additional Delhi land should simply expand confinement, holding that wildlife should not be kept in restrictive enclosures except in exceptional circumstances justified by law and ecology. It also said the Hauz Khas area must remain a protected forest and its nature or status cannot be altered. The park's mini-zoo recognition had been cancelled due to non-compliance and expiry of licence in August 2021. The court endorsed a structured roadmap: acclimatisation, soft release instead of abrupt release, veterinary supervision, telemetry collars and post-release monitoring. National wildlife translocation protocols must be finalised within six months, and the next compliance hearing is listed for 19 January 2027.
Supreme Court on 27 April 2026 Upholds Scientific Translocation of Surplus Deer from Delhi's A N Jha Deer Park to Rajasthan Tiger Reserves, Retains Cap of 38 Deer
The Supreme Court upheld on 27 April 2026 the scientific relocation of surplus deer from Delhi's A N Jha Deer Park to reserves including Mukundra Hills and Ramgarh Vishdhari in Rajasthan. It accepted a carrying capacity of about 38 deer, ordered time-bound translocation under scientific protocols, and required national wildlife translocation guidelines within six months.
Key facts
- The Supreme Court heard the matter on 27 April 2026 and upheld relocation of surplus spotted deer from A N Jha Deer Park.
- Destination reserves include Mukundra Hills Tiger Reserve and Ramgarh Vishdhari Tiger Reserve in Rajasthan.
- A bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta accepted the Central Empowered Committee's findings.
- Only up to 38 deer may be retained in the park, subject to Central Zoo Authority approval and norms.
- The enclosure is about 10.26 acres and can sustainably support about 19 deer pairs under zoo authority norms.
- The court required scientific translocation with acclimatisation, soft release, veterinary supervision, telemetry collars and monitoring.
- National wildlife translocation protocols must be finalised within six months, with a compliance hearing on 19 January 2027.
6-axis classification
Appears in these topics
Practice MCQ from this story
SolveTap an option below. Correct or incorrect feedback appears instantly.
Which scientific safeguards did the Supreme Court endorse for deer translocation from A N Jha Deer Park?
The court endorsed structured scientific translocation with acclimatisation, soft release, veterinary supervision, telemetry collars and post-release monitoring. Immediate release, permanent confinement and private auction are contrary to the committee's recommendations and the court's reasoning.
Source: The Indian Express
Frequently asked questions
Which Rajasthan reserves are part of the deer relocation plan?
The plan includes Mukundra Hills Tiger Reserve and Ramgarh Vishdhari Tiger Reserve in Rajasthan.
How many deer can remain at A N Jha Deer Park?
Up to 38 deer may be retained, subject to Central Zoo Authority approval and compliance with norms.
Why did the committee support translocation?
It found severe overcapacity, lack of effective population control and poor compliance with zoo management standards.
What safeguards did the court endorse for translocation?
It endorsed acclimatisation, soft release, veterinary supervision, telemetry collars and post-release monitoring.
What is the next compliance date?
The Supreme Court listed the next compliance hearing for 19 January 2027.
Was this useful?
Share corrections or missing exam angles with the editorial team.
Send feedback