94. Recent Constitutional Developments, Judicial Pronouncements, Constitutional Morality, Transformative Constitutionalism — Full Notes
हालिया संवैधानिक विकास, न्यायिक निर्णय, संवैधानिक नैतिकता, परिवर्तनकारी संविधानवादSign up free to read more
Access all sections, predicted questions, and revision tables.
CORE Key Points at a Glance
- 1
Constitutional Morality
- Term used by Dr. Ambedkar in the Constituent Assembly
- Refers to adherence to constitutional values (democratic process, individual rights, institutional procedures) over popular morality (majoritarian social norms)
- Supreme Court invoked it in Navtej Singh Johar (2018) and Sabarimala (2018) to protect minority rights against popular opposition
- 2
Transformative Constitutionalism
- Idea that a constitution is not merely a static legal document but a transformative instrument for social change
- Indian Constitution — embracing equality, dignity, and fraternity — was designed to transform a hierarchical society
- Justice D.Y. Chandrachud has been its foremost judicial proponent in India
- 3
Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India (2018)
- Supreme Court (5-judge bench, unanimous) struck down Section 377 IPC (consensual homosexual acts between adults)
- Violated Articles 14, 15, 19, and 21
- Held that sexual orientation is a protected ground under Article 15 (analogous to "sex")
- Affirmed the right to sexual autonomy under Article 21
- 4
Joseph Shine v. Union of India (2018)
- Supreme Court (5-judge bench, unanimous) struck down Section 497 IPC (adultery law)
- Violated Articles 14, 15, and 21 — provision treated women as property of husbands
- Held that marital choices belong to individual autonomy
- Eliminated a colonial-era law treating wives as subordinate
- 5
Shayara Bano v. Union of India (2017)
- Supreme Court by 3:2 majority struck down instant triple talaq (talaq-e-biddat) as manifestly arbitrary — violating Article 14
- Parliament enacted the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act 2019
- Instant triple talaq made a criminal offence punishable with up to 3 years imprisonment
- 6
K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017)
- Landmark 9-judge bench (unanimous) held Right to Privacy is a Fundamental Right under Article 21
- Overruled M.P. Sharma (1954) and Kharak Singh (1963)
- Far-reaching implications for data protection, Aadhaar, surveillance, and individual autonomy
- 7
Indian Young Lawyers Association v. State of Kerala (Sabarimala, 2018)
- 4:1 majority held exclusion of women aged 10–50 from Sabarimala temple violated Articles 14, 15, 17, and 25
- Justice Indu Malhotra dissented
- Court invoked constitutional morality over popular/religious morality
- Referred to a 9-judge bench in 2019 for broader questions on religion vs gender rights
- 8
Janhit Abhiyan v. Union of India (2022)
- Supreme Court by 3:2 majority upheld the 103rd Constitutional Amendment providing 10% EWS reservation
- Held it does not violate the Basic Structure; economic criterion is a valid classification
- Two dissenters (Justices Ravindra Bhat and Sudhanshu Dhulia) held it breaches the 50% ceiling and violates equality
- 9
In Re: Article 370 (2023)
- Constitutional Bench (5 judges, unanimous) upheld the Presidential Order of August 2019 abrogating J&K's special status
- Article 370 was a temporary provision; J&K's sovereignty had completely merged with India
- President's Rule under Article 356 allowed Parliament to exercise J&K Constituent Assembly functions
- Directed elections by September 2024
- 10
Rohith Vemula (2016) and Constitutional Identity
- Debate following Rohith Vemula's institutional suicide intensified discussions on caste-based discrimination in educational institutions
- Highlighted the gap between constitutional ideals (Articles 15, 17, 21) and lived reality
- Illustrates the tension between constitutional text and transformative social achievement
- 11
Citizenship Amendment Act 2019 (CAA)
- Provided expedited citizenship to persecuted non-Muslim minorities (Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis, Christians) from Afghanistan, Bangladesh, and Pakistan who arrived before 31 December 2014
- Rules notified in March 2024
- Petitions challenging CAA as violating Article 14 (discriminating on religion) are pending before the Supreme Court
- 12
New Criminal Law Trilogy (2023)
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 2023 replaced IPC 1860
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) 2023 replaced CrPC 1973
- Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) 2023 replaced Indian Evidence Act 1872
- All came into force 1 July 2024; emphasises "Justice first, punishment second"
PREDICTED Predicted RAS Questions
Based on PYQ trends and 2026 syllabus analysis
1 5M What is constitutional morality? How has the Supreme Court applied it in recent cases?
Model Answer
Constitutional morality, a concept invoked by Dr. Ambedkar, means adherence to constitutional values — democratic processes, individual rights, institutional procedures — over popular (majoritarian) norms. The Supreme Court applied it in Navtej Singh Johar (2018) to decriminalise consensual homosexuality despite public opposition, and in Sabarimala (2018) to allow women's entry into a temple despite religious custom. Constitutional morality protects minorities from majority overreach.
(56 words)
~50 words • 5 marks
