State Legislature & High Courts
Key facts
- Article 168 makes the Governor part of the State Legislature, but not a House member.
- Article 169 lets Parliament create or abolish a Legislative Council after a special Assembly resolution.
- Article 200 links State law-making to High Court protection through mandatory reservation in specific cases.
- Article 226 is wider than Article 32 because it covers Fundamental Rights and other legal rights.
- L. Chandra Kumar, 1997, makes High Court judicial review under Articles 226 and 227 part of basic structure.
Key Points at a Glance
- 1
Article 168 makes the Governor part of the State Legislature, but not a House member.
- 2
Article 169 lets Parliament create or abolish a Legislative Council after a special Assembly resolution.
- 3
State Legislative Councils can delay ordinary Bills but cannot cause a joint sitting or defeat Money Bills.
- 4
Article 200 links State law-making to High Court protection through mandatory reservation in specific cases.
- 5
Article 226 is wider than Article 32 because it covers Fundamental Rights and other legal rights.
- 6
L. Chandra Kumar, 1997, makes High Court judicial review under Articles 226 and 227 part of basic structure.
- 7
High Court judges are appointed under Article 217 and hold office until 62 years of age.
- 8
Kihoto Hollohan, 1992, allows judicial review of Speaker decisions under the Tenth Schedule after decision.
Continue studying
Constitutional map and why the two institutions are studied together
- Core location: State Legislatures are placed in Part VI, Chapter III, mainly Articles 168-212; High Courts are in Part VI, Chapter V, Articles 214-231. The two blocks sit in the same Part because state-level law-making and state-level constitutional control are designed to operate in dialogue.
- Definition: A State Legislature is not only the elected Legislative Assembly. Under Article 168 it includes the Governor and, where a State is bicameral, the Legislative Council. A High Court is the constitutional court of record for a State under Articles 214 and 215, with writ, appellate, supervisory and administrative roles.
- UPSC framing: Questions usually combine a plain article number with a procedural exception. Examples include Article 169 Council creation, Article 200 assent, Article 201 Presidential consideration, Article 226 writ jurisdiction and Article 227 superintendence.
- Federal design: State Legislatures make laws mostly on State List subjects and, subject to constitutional limits, on Concurrent List subjects. High Courts test executive and legislative action under the Constitution, ordinary statutes and principles of natural justice.
- Institutional balance: The Governor participates in the legislature but is not a House; the High Court is outside the legislature but can review laws after enactment. Article 212 protects legislative procedure from court interference only for procedural irregularity, not for substantive unconstitutionality.
- Exam caution: Do not isolate the legislature from the judiciary. A Bill affecting High Court powers can trigger mandatory reservation under Article 200, and a Speaker's anti-defection decision can later face judicial review under Articles 226 and 227.
- Contemporary reason: Disputes over pending Bills, session summoning, Speaker decisions and judicial vacancies have made this topic more than a static article list. Prelims can ask the current debate through old text.
- Working mental model: Assembly represents popular mandate; Council, where present, gives revision; Governor performs constitutional gateways; High Court guards legality. The friction points are therefore predictable: assent, privileges, disqualification, judicial appointments and writ control.
Open the complete note
This public page shows the first available section. The study pack opens the complete topic with all revision material.
9 more sections in the complete note
Open study packPredictedPredicted Questions
Use these prompts to test answer structure before moving to practice.
1MCQConsider the following statements about Legislative Councils in States: 1. Parliament may create or abolish a Council only after a special resolution of the concerned Legislative Assembly. 2. A Council can reject a Money Bill and thereby force a joint sitting. 3. One-third of Council members retire every 2 years. Which statements are correct?
Explanation
Statement 1 follows Article 169 and statement 3 reflects the continuing character of the Council. Statement 2 is wrong because there is no State joint sitting and the Council has only a recommendatory role on Money Bills.
~50 words · 1 marks
