Key facts

  • Shivaji's 1674 Raigad coronation asserted sovereign kingship, coinage and the Rajyabhishek era.
  • Chauth was generally 25 per cent and sardeshmukhi an additional 10 per cent revenue claim.
  • Panipat 1761 was a severe defeat, but Maratha recovery followed under Madhavrao I and Mahadji Scindia.
  • Treaty of Bassein 1802 tied the Peshwa to the Company and split Maratha chiefs.
  • Article 49, Article 51A(f), AMASR Act 1958 and UNESCO Convention 1972 govern heritage protection.

Key Points at a Glance

  1. 1

    Shivaji's 1674 Raigad coronation asserted sovereign kingship, coinage and the Rajyabhishek era.

  2. 2

    Ashta Pradhan was a royal council, not a modern cabinet; the Peshwa later became dominant.

  3. 3

    Chauth was generally 25 per cent and sardeshmukhi an additional 10 per cent revenue claim.

  4. 4

    Panipat 1761 was a severe defeat, but Maratha recovery followed under Madhavrao I and Mahadji Scindia.

  5. 5

    Treaty of Bassein 1802 tied the Peshwa to the Company and split Maratha chiefs.

  6. 6

    Article 49, Article 51A(f), AMASR Act 1958 and UNESCO Convention 1972 govern heritage protection.

  7. 7

    Maratha Military Landscapes were inscribed in 2025 as India's 44th World Heritage property.

  8. 8

    Maratha Confederacy was a shifting power arrangement, not a formal constitutional federation.

UPSC study hubView study packs

Concept: from Deccan state to pan-Indian Maratha power

  • The Maratha Empire was not a single unchanging institution. For Prelims, read it in three layers: Shivaji's compact sovereign kingdom, the Peshwa-led expansion after Shahu, and the looser Maratha Confederacy of major houses.
  • Shivaji's core idea was swarajya: political autonomy, control over forts, revenue discipline, protection of subjects, and cultural assertion through Marathi-Sanskrit administrative vocabulary.
  • The empire grew from the western Deccan because geography mattered: hill forts, broken terrain, coastal access, and mobile cavalry made a smaller power resist larger Mughal and Deccan Sultanate armies.
  • The term confederacy is useful only for the later phase. It refers to a network where the Peshwa at Pune, the Chhatrapati at Satara, and houses such as Scindia, Holkar, Bhonsle and Gaekwad operated with varying loyalty and autonomy.
  • UPSC often tests the transformation, not only dates: a centralized fort-based state under Shivaji gradually became a revenue-sharing, cavalry-expansion and regional-house system.
  • The topic sits between medieval and modern India. It explains the weakening of Mughal authority, the rise of 18th-century regional states, and why the East India Company had to fight three Anglo-Maratha Wars before becoming paramount.
  • Art and culture are not secondary here. Forts, naval defences, seals, coins, court language, the Rajyabhishek era and the 2025 UNESCO recognition of Maratha Military Landscapes connect political history with heritage.
  • A safe definition: Maratha power was an early modern Indian polity that began as Shivaji's Deccan kingdom, expanded across much of India under the Peshwas, and later functioned through semi-autonomous Maratha houses.
  • Avoid two traps: do not call every Maratha chief independent from the beginning, and do not treat the Peshwa as merely a minister after the mid-18th century.
  • The exam value lies in linking institutions with mechanisms: forts enabled defence, chauth financed expansion, Ashta Pradhan formalised administration, and confederacy politics created both reach and weakness.
  • The word empire should therefore be used with nuance. It captures wide territorial influence, but not a uniform Mughal-style imperial administration everywhere.
  • Another conceptual distinction is between Maratha people, Maratha state, and Maratha Confederacy. Ethnic identity, ruling apparatus and later political coalition overlap but are not identical.
  • For a map-based question, place the core in the Sahyadri-Konkan-Deccan zone, then follow expansion into Malwa, Gujarat, Bundelkhand, Odisha and the northern court politics around Delhi.
  • Finally, the subject must be read as a process of state formation. Shivaji built legitimacy and command; the Peshwas converted it into wider claims; the confederacy dispersed power; the Company converted treaties into supremacy.

Open the complete note

This public page shows the first available section. The study pack opens the complete topic with all revision material.

9 more sections in the complete note

Open study pack

PredictedPredicted Questions

Use these prompts to test answer structure before moving to practice.

1MCQConsider the following statements about chauth and sardeshmukhi: 1. Chauth was generally a one-fourth revenue claim. 2. Sardeshmukhi was an additional 10 per cent claim. 3. Collection of chauth always meant direct annexation. Which statements are correct?1 marks · 50 words
  1. A1 and 2 onlyCorrect
  2. B2 and 3 only
  3. C1 and 3 only
  4. D1, 2 and 3

Explanation

Statements 1 and 2 are correct; chauth did not automatically imply direct rule or annexation.

~50 words · 1 marks