Census 2011 MCQ — 60 Practice Questions with Answers

Explanation

The descending sequence is Jaipur with 1,003,302 Scheduled Castes population followed by Dungarpur with 52,267. The Dungarpur-Jaipur sequence reverses the two extremes, the Jaipur-52,267 formulation assigns Jaipur the lowest figure, and the Jaisalmer formulation wrongly names Jaisalmer instead of Dungarpur as the lowest Scheduled Castes district in this fact.

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct because the cited Population Finder 2011 fact says its figures are retrieved from the Primary Census Abstract data tables. Statement 2 is wrong because Sample Registration System bulletins are a different demographic source and are not named as the retrieval base here. Statement 3 is wrong because National Sample Survey consumption tables are survey data, not the Population Finder 2011 source identified in the fact.

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct because Rajasthan ranked 8th by total workers in the Census 2011 state/UT PCA rows. Statement 2 is correct because the total-workers count was 29,886,255. Statement 3 is wrong because 29,886,255 is a count of workers, not a work participation rate.

Explanation

Jaipur with 4,161,285 non-workers and Jaisalmer with 381,016 non-workers is the Census 2011 district PCA pair tested here. Jodhpur and Jalore, Udaipur and Barmer, and Kota and Dungarpur are plausible Rajasthan district pairs, but they do not match the stated highest-lowest non-worker figures in the cited fact.

Explanation

The correct matching is 0-6 years population with 10,649,504, exactly as given in the sourced Census 2011 fact for Rajasthan. The figure 12,221,593 belongs to the Scheduled Castes count, 9,238,534 belongs to the Scheduled Tribes count, and 17,048,085 is the urban population figure, so those do not match the 0-6 years category.