RAS question
With reference to the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Rules, 2026, consider the following statements: 1) The rules permit online money games provided they are based on skill rather than chance. 2) Banks and financial intermediaries are exempt from any obligation related to online gaming transactions. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Correct answer: (D) Neither 1 nor 2.
Under the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Rules, 2026, online money games are prohibited even if based on skill, and banks or payment systems are not exempt from transaction-related obligations.
Explanation
Both statements are incorrect. The PIB note on the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Rules, 2026 says the framework distinguishes prohibited online money games from permissible e-sports and online social games. It further explains that online money games involve financial stakes and may be based on chance, skill, or both. The ban is therefore not limited to games of chance: it covers all online money games, including skill-based ones, along with their advertising, promotion and facilitation. The second statement also fails because the PIB note says banks and payment systems are barred from processing transactions linked to such games, while the Online Gaming Authority of India coordinates with financial institutions for enforcement.
Why the other options are wrong
- (A) Statement 1 is wrong because the rules do not permit skill-based online money games; the prohibition covers money games based on chance, skill, or any mix of the two.
- (B) Statement 2 is wrong because banks and payment systems have transaction-related duties and are barred from processing transactions linked to prohibited online money games.
- (C) Both statements cannot be correct because the rules ban all online money games and place enforcement-linked obligations on financial intermediaries rather than exempting them.
Concept
This tests regulatory governance under new digital-economy rules, especially the distinction between permissible online gaming and prohibited online money gaming. It recurs in RAS because such questions combine current legislation, institutional design and consumer-protection regulation.
