RAS question
Under the Smart Cities Mission, each selected city must implement projects through a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV). Which of the following statements about the SPV model is CORRECT?
Correct answer: (B) SPV is a limited company registered under the Companies Act, with the state government and ULB each holding at least 50% equity.
Under the Smart Cities Mission, each selected city’s SPV is a limited company incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013, with 50:50 equity shareholding between the State or UT government and the Urban Local Body as promoters.
Explanation
The SPV model is meant to keep Smart Cities Mission implementation city-focused while giving it a corporate legal form. Press Information Bureau, Government of India says all 100 selected cities set up Special Purpose Vehicles under the Companies Act, 2013, with a 50:50 equity shareholding between the State or UT government or administration and the respective Urban Local Body as promoters. That is why option B is right: the SPV is not a Ministry department or a private-majority PPP, but a jointly promoted limited company. Its mandate is to implement the mission through focused planning, project development, and on-ground execution, which matches the question’s stress on implementation through an SPV.
Why the other options are wrong
- (A) The SPV is not a Central Government department under the Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs; it is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013, and promoted by the State or UT government and the ULB.
- (C) The SPV structure gives 50:50 promoter equity to the State or UT government and the ULB, so it is not a private-sector-majority public-private partnership.
- (D) The SPV has an independent board and CEO, so it is not a body that reports only to the elected Mayor without its own board.
Concept
This tests urban governance under the Smart Cities Mission, especially the institutional design used to implement city-level projects. It recurs in RAS because Rajasthan urban development questions often ask how central schemes are translated into state and ULB-level execution mechanisms.
