Published: 6 July 2026Press Information BureauRajasthan
Narmada Award Beneficiary States Settle Pending Payments
AQuick answer
Maharashtra, Gujarat, Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh signed a one-time settlement in New Delhi to resolve pending Narmada Award payments linked with Sardar Sarovar Project cost-sharing.
Key facts
The agreement involved Maharashtra, Gujarat, Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh.
It was signed in New Delhi in the presence of Amit Shah and C. R. Patil.
The settlement relates to pending Narmada Award payments.
The dispute was linked with cost-sharing for Sardar Sarovar Project construction.
Pending dues were resolved as a one-time settlement.
The agreement was presented as an example of cooperative federalism in water disputes.
A historic agreement was signed in New Delhi to settle pending payments among the Narmada Award beneficiary states: Maharashtra, Gujarat, Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh. The agreement took place in the presence of Union Home and Cooperation Minister Amit Shah and Union Jal Shakti Minister C. R. Patil. The Chief Ministers of Maharashtra, Gujarat, Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh signed it, and senior officials of the Centre and the four states were also present.
The settlement addresses long-running disputes linked with cost-sharing for the construction of the Sardar Sarovar Project. Pending dues to be paid as final settlement have been resolved as a one-time settlement. For Rajasthan, the issue is important because the project was described as beneficial especially for Madhya Pradesh, Gujarat and Rajasthan. Amit Shah said that after the dam was completed, water and electricity reached these states, and where Narmada water reached Rajasthan, both land price and the farmer's situation changed.
For RAS preparation, the agreement is useful as a factual example of inter-state water governance and cooperative federalism. Amit Shah linked the settlement with efforts to strengthen water security and cooperative federalism. He also cited the Kishau dam issue, the Rajasthan-Haryana water dispute and this agreement as examples of cooperative federalism, adding that water used anywhere in the country ultimately benefits an Indian and disputes should be resolved by keeping national loss in mind.
0
6-axis classification
CoverageRajasthanSubjectRajasthanExamBothSourcePress Information Bureau
Practice MCQ from this story
Solve
Tap an option below. Correct or incorrect feedback appears instantly.
Linked questionMedium
Consider the following statements about the Narmada Award beneficiary states' payment settlement:
1. The agreement was signed by the Chief Ministers of Maharashtra, Gujarat, Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh in New Delhi.
2. The agreement was about the Rajasthan-Haryana water dispute.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Explanation · Correct answer A
Statement 1 is correct because the Chief Ministers of the four states signed the agreement in New Delhi. Statement 2 is incorrect because the agreement settled pending Narmada Award payments linked with Sardar Sarovar Project cost-sharing, while the Rajasthan-Haryana water dispute was mentioned separately.
Which states were part of the Narmada Award payment settlement?
Maharashtra, Gujarat, Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh were part of the settlement.
What issue did the agreement settle?
It settled pending payments linked with the Narmada Award and cost-sharing for Sardar Sarovar Project construction.
Where was the agreement signed?
The agreement was signed in New Delhi.
Why is the agreement relevant for Rajasthan?
Rajasthan was one of the beneficiary states, and the source notes that Narmada water changed land price and the farmer's situation where it reached Rajasthan.
Was this useful?
Share corrections or missing exam angles with the editorial team.