Published: 24 March 2026DD News / LiveLawPolity
Rajya Sabha Passes Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Bill 2026, Removes Self-Identification Clause
The Rajya Sabha passed the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Bill, 2026 on March 25, 2026, a day after it was passed by the Lok Sabha on March 24. The bill amends the original Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019.
The most significant change introduced by the amendment is the removal of the self-identification clause from the 2019 Act. Under the 2019 Act, any person could apply for a certificate of identity as a transgender person based on their self-perceived gender identity, with a District Magistrate issuing the certificate. The amendment replaces this with a new process requiring a medical examination by a district-level screening committee before a certificate is issued.
The amended bill also revises the definition of 'transgender person' to explicitly include socio-cultural identities such as kinner, hijra, aravani, and jogta. However, critics argue that while these identities are now recognised, the removal of self-identification contradicts the Supreme Court's landmark NALSA judgment (2014), which affirmed the right to self-identify one's gender as a fundamental right under Article 21.
Human rights organisations including Amnesty International described the amendment as a "major step backward" for transgender rights in India. Opposition members in both Houses argued that subjecting individuals to medical screening to obtain a gender identity certificate is invasive and violates bodily autonomy. Supporters of the bill contend that the new definition better reflects ground-level socio-cultural realities and addresses implementation gaps in the 2019 Act.
0Mains angle
Q: Critically examine the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Bill 2026 in light of the Supreme Court's NALSA judgment and Article 21. (25 words)
Answer (50 words):
Rajya Sabha passed the Amendment Bill on 25 March 2026, a day after the Lok Sabha. It removes self-identification, mandates district-level medical screening and adds kinner, hijra, aravani, jogta identities. Critics, including Amnesty, argue it reverses the 2014 NALSA verdict on self-identified gender as an Article 21 fundamental right.
6-axis classification
CoverageNationalSubjectNationalExamBasic Computer Instructor · CET Graduation · CET Senior Secondary · EO/RO · LDC · Mahila Supervisor · Patwar · PTI · RAS · REET · RPSC SI · School Lecturer · Senior Computer Instructor · Senior Teacher · UPSC · Vanpal · BothSourceDD News / LiveLaw
Practice MCQ from this story
SolveTap an option below. Correct or incorrect feedback appears instantly.
Linked questionMedium
The Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Bill 2026, passed by both Houses of Parliament in March 2026, removes which key provision from the parent 2019 Act?
Explanation · Correct answer BThe Amendment Bill 2026 removes the self-identification clause, under which a person could obtain a transgender identity certificate based on self-perceived gender identity without medical examination. The new process requires screening by a district-level committee.
Frequently asked questions
What was the NALSA judgment 2014?
The Supreme Court in National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India (2014) recognised transgender persons as a third gender and affirmed their right to self-identify their gender, holding it as a fundamental right under Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution.
What did the Transgender Persons Act 2019 say about self-identification?
The 2019 Act allowed any person to apply for a certificate of identity as a transgender person based on self-perceived gender identity, with the District Magistrate issuing the certificate without requiring medical examination.
What is the difference between socio-cultural identity and self-perceived gender identity?
Socio-cultural identities (like hijra, kinner) are community-defined, historically rooted identities. Self-perceived gender identity is an individual's internal sense of their own gender, which may or may not align with community categories — the amendment recognises the former but removes the latter.
What are the grounds of opposition to the Amendment Bill 2026?
Critics argue it violates the NALSA judgment, imposes invasive medical screening, reduces bodily autonomy, and is incompatible with international human rights norms like the Yogyakarta Principles.
What are the Yogyakarta Principles?
The Yogyakarta Principles (2006, updated 2017) are international principles on the application of international human rights law to sexual orientation and gender identity, widely used as a reference in transgender rights debates.
