Skip to main content

History

Conservation Challenges and Policy Framework

Heritage Sites and Tourism in Rajasthan

Paper I · Unit 1 Section 9 of 15 0 PYQs 41 min

Public Section Preview

Conservation Challenges and Policy Framework

Heritage vs. Tourism Tension

The fundamental challenge of heritage site management in Rajasthan is the tension between conservation and access . Every additional tourist generates both benefits and costs:

  • Benefits: Entry fees, local employment, handicraft sales
  • Costs: Foot traffic erosion, humidity from breath, vibration from vehicles, encroachment pressure from hotels and food stalls

Carrying capacity is the central management concept. Three sites illustrate the problem most clearly:

  • Jaisalmer Living Fort: ASI and UNESCO have repeatedly flagged over-tourism. The fort's drainage system was built for 3,000 residents; currently hosting 3,000 residents plus 4 lakh+ annual visitors creates waterlogging stress on the sandstone foundations.
  • Amber Fort, Jaipur: Visitor footfall reached 19 lakh in 2023-24 — the single most-visited ASI monument in Rajasthan. Vehicular access causes vibration damage; ASI restricts vehicle entry to designated battery-operated shuttles since 2022.
  • Keoladeo Ghana: Water availability fluctuates with competing agricultural demands from Ajan Bund. The park's bird count (370+ species) is visitor-sensitive; IUCN recommended strict zone-based access.

Encroachment and the 100-Metre Rule

The AMASR Amendment 2010's prohibited zone (100 m) has been contested in multiple Rajasthan cases:

  • Nahargarh Fort, Jaipur (2017): Supreme Court ordered demolition of a restaurant constructed within the prohibited zone on ASI-protected hillside
  • Chittorgarh encroachment: Residential construction within the fort perimeter is an ongoing dispute between ASI, state government, and 3,000+ residents living inside the fort area

Funding and Maintenance Gap

ASI's total annual maintenance budget for all 3,693 centrally protected monuments nationally is approximately ₹1,000 crore (2024-25 Union Budget allocation). Rajasthan's 174 monuments receive proportional but limited funding. The gap is bridged partly through three mechanisms:

  • Entry fee revenue: Amber Fort generates the largest entry fee revenue in Rajasthan (₹25–200 per person depending on category)
  • Corporate CSR: Companies adopt monuments under the "Adopt a Heritage 2.0" scheme (launched 2023 by Ministry of Tourism); companies pay maintenance costs in exchange for moderate co-branding rights
  • State grants: Rajasthan's budget allocation for Archaeology and Museums department (2024-25): ₹312 crore

Adopt a Heritage Scheme in Rajasthan

The Adopt a Heritage scheme has been particularly active in Rajasthan:

  • Amber Fort: Adopted by Dalmia Bharat Group
  • Chittorgarh Fort: Under MoU with RINL (Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Ltd.)
  • Jantar Mantar, Jaipur: IRCTC has a co-management agreement for visitor services

Digital Conservation Initiatives

Three major digital tools are now deployed for heritage conservation:

  • 3D laser scanning of Chittorgarh Fort (2021–2023) by ASI to create a baseline architectural record for tracking structural changes
  • Drone survey mapping of all 174 Rajasthan ASI monuments completed 2022 — baseline for encroachment monitoring
  • Virtual Reality (VR) heritage experience centres: Proposed at Jaipur (near Jantar Mantar) and Chittorgarh under Smart Heritage City initiatives