Public Section Preview
Personality and Stress
5.1 Type A and Type B Personality
First described by cardiologists Meyer Friedman and Ray Rosenman (1959) who noticed that their heart patients displayed distinct behavioral patterns:
| Dimension | Type A | Type B |
|---|---|---|
| Pace | Time-urgent, always rushing | Relaxed, comfortable with time |
| Competition | Highly competitive, needs to win | Less competitive, cooperative |
| Hostility | Easily irritated, hostile | Patient, rarely hostile |
| Multitasking | Polyphasic - does many things at once | Focuses on one task at a time |
| Health Risk | High - cardiovascular disease risk is about 2x higher | Lower cardiovascular risk |
Note: Research has refined the Type A concept - it is primarily the hostility component (not time urgency alone) that most strongly predicts cardiovascular disease.
Type C personality (Temoshok): Cancer-prone personality; passive, suppresses emotions, people-pleasing. Under high stress, internalises rather than externalises.
Type D personality (Denollet): "Distressed" type - negative affectivity + social inhibition; associated with poor cardiac outcomes and increased burnout.
5.2 The Big Five (OCEAN) and Stress
| Trait | High | Low | Stress Relevance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Openness | Creative, curious, flexible | Conventional | High openness helps appraise stressors as challenges |
| Conscientiousness | Organized, disciplined | Impulsive | High C = protective: planned coping, goal-directed |
| Extraversion | Sociable, assertive | Introverted | Extraverts seek social support more readily |
| Agreeableness | Cooperative, trusting | Antagonistic | Low A linked to workplace conflict |
| Neuroticism | Emotionally unstable, anxious | Stable | Highest predictor of stress susceptibility and burnout |
High Neuroticism is the strongest single Big Five predictor of burnout and psychological distress. High Conscientiousness is the strongest protective factor.
5.3 Hardiness (Kobasa, 1979)
Suzanne Kobasa studied Illinois Bell Telephone executives during a period of massive organizational upheaval (1970s) and found that some remained healthy under extreme stress while others developed illness. The healthy group showed a personality pattern she called Hardiness, comprising three Cs:
| Component | Meaning | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Commitment | Engaging fully with life and work; sense of meaning and purpose | "My work matters to society" |
| Control | Belief that one can influence outcomes; internal locus of control | "I can take steps to change this situation" |
| Challenge | Viewing change and stressors as opportunities for growth | "This difficulty will make me stronger" |
Hardy individuals show stress inoculation - they reframe stressors as less threatening and use them for growth, resulting in lower cortisol response and lower burnout risk.
Locus of Control (Rotter, 1954):
- Internal: Believe outcomes depend on their own actions -> less perceived stress, more problem-focused coping
- External: Believe outcomes are controlled by luck, fate, others -> more perceived stress, passive coping
5.4 Resilience
Psychological resilience is the capacity to recover from adversity, trauma, or significant stress. Resilient individuals show:
- Strong social connections
- Positive self-appraisal (self-efficacy)
- Flexible, adaptive coping repertoire
- Ability to find meaning in adversity
Resilience is not a fixed trait but can be developed through training and experience.
