Skip to main content

Behavior and Law

Quick Revision Table

Flourishing at Work: Virtues, Strengths, RAISEC Model, Person-Environment Fit

Paper III · Unit 3 Section 12 of 13 0 PYQs 25 min

Public Section Preview

Quick Revision Table

Concept Key Fact RPSC Relevance
Flourishing Optimal functioning (eudaimonic); Seligman (2011) Core concept — definition
PERMA P-E-R-M-A; Seligman (2011); +V for Vitality Expected 5-mark Q
Positive Psychology Seligman & Csikszentmihalyi (2000); APA special issue Foundation of topic
Hedonic vs Eudaimonic Pleasure vs meaning/virtue; flourishing is eudaimonic Conceptual distinction
Flow Csikszentmihalyi (1990); skill-challenge balance; = E in PERMA 5-mark Q probable
VIA Classification Seligman & Peterson (2004); 24 strengths, 6 virtues VIA Q probable
6 Virtues Wisdom, Courage, Humanity, Justice, Temperance, Transcendence VIA table
Signature Strengths Top 3-7 VIA strengths; using them raises engagement 38% VIA application
Holland RIASEC (1959) 6 types; congruence predicts satisfaction; hexagonal model RAISEC — expected Q
Realistic (R) Practical, hands-on; tools, machines; police, engineer Holland type
Social (S) Helpful, empathetic; welfare work, teaching Holland type — admin relevant
Enterprising (E) Persuasive, ambitious; management, politics Holland type — IAS/RAS
P-E Fit Kristof-Brown (2005); PJ, PO, PG, PV fit types P-E fit theory
ASA Model Schneider (1987); Attraction-Selection-Attrition Organisational homogeneity
SDT Deci & Ryan (1985); Autonomy + Competence + Relatedness Psychological needs
Job Crafting Wrzesniewski & Dutton (2001); Task, Relational, Cognitive Active flourishing path
Calling Orientation Wrzesniewski (1997); highest flourishing vs Job/Career Work meaning