Public Section Preview
Contingency / Situational Theories
4.1 Fiedler's Contingency Model (1967)
Fred Fiedler (1967, A Theory of Leadership Effectiveness) argued that no single leadership style is effective in all situations — effectiveness depends on the match between style and situation.
Step 1: Measure Leadership Style
Using the Least Preferred Co-worker (LPC) Scale — ask leader to rate their least preferred co-worker. High LPC = relationship-motivated leader; Low LPC = task-motivated leader.
Step 2: Measure Situational Favourableness
Three factors:
- Leader-Member Relations: Quality of interpersonal relationships (Good/Poor)
- Task Structure: Degree to which the job is clearly defined (Structured/Unstructured)
- Position Power: Formal authority of the leader (Strong/Weak)
Matching:
- Task-motivated (Low LPC) leaders are most effective in very favourable (high control) and very unfavourable (low control) situations
- Relationship-motivated (High LPC) leaders are most effective in moderately favourable situations
Criticism: LPC scale's validity questioned; assumes leadership style is fixed (not developable).
4.2 Hersey and Blanchard's Situational Leadership Theory (1969, 1977)
Paul Hersey and Ken Blanchard (1969) proposed that effective leaders adapt their style to the follower's readiness/maturity — defined as a combination of:
- Competence: Skills and knowledge for the task
- Commitment: Motivation and confidence
Four Leadership Styles (matched to Follower Readiness levels):
| Style | Behaviour | Follower Level | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| S1 — Telling (Directing) | High Task, Low Relationship | R1: Low competence, Low commitment | Give specific instructions; closely supervise |
| S2 — Selling (Coaching) | High Task, High Relationship | R2: Some competence, Low commitment | Explain decisions; encourage questions |
| S3 — Participating (Supporting) | Low Task, High Relationship | R3: High competence, Variable commitment | Share ideas; support and encourage |
| S4 — Delegating | Low Task, Low Relationship | R4: High competence, High commitment | Give responsibility; minimal oversight |
Applied to public administration: A new sub-divisional officer (SDO) joining a district needs S1 (Telling). A senior section officer with 20 years' experience needs S4 (Delegating). The collector must diagnose follower readiness and flex accordingly.
