Skip to main content

Behavior and Law

Behavioural Theories of Leadership

Leadership: Theories, Types, Styles, Challenges, Effectiveness

Paper III · Unit 3 Section 4 of 12 0 PYQs 22 min

Public Section Preview

Behavioural Theories of Leadership

3.1 The Ohio State Studies (1945–1948)

Researchers at Ohio State University (Hemphill, Fleishman) analysed hundreds of leader behaviour descriptions and reduced them to two independent dimensions:

Dimension Description High Scorer Behaviour
Initiating Structure Degree to which the leader organises work, assigns tasks, establishes deadlines Defines roles clearly; high output expectation
Consideration Degree to which the leader shows concern for followers' feelings, mutual trust, and job satisfaction Supportive; listens to followers; approachable

Both dimensions are independent — a leader can be high on both (ideal) or low on both.

3.2 University of Michigan Studies (Likert, 1947–1961)

Rensis Likert at Michigan identified two contrasting styles:

  • Production-centred leadership: Focus on task completion, technical aspects, and close supervision
  • Employee-centred leadership: Focus on relationships, employee development, and participative decision-making

Employee-centred style showed consistently higher productivity, satisfaction, and lower turnover in Michigan studies.

Likert's 4 Systems of Management (1961):

  1. Exploitative-Authoritative: No trust; fear motivation; top-down
  2. Benevolent-Authoritative: Some trust; paternalistic; limited participation
  3. Consultative: Considerable trust; some participation; goals set jointly
  4. Participative Group: Full trust; team-based; high performance (ideal)

3.3 Blake and Mouton's Managerial Grid (1964)

Robert Blake and Jane Mouton (1964, The Managerial Grid) created a 2-dimensional framework:

X-Axis: Concern for Production (1–9)
Y-Axis: Concern for People (1–9)

Grid Position Style Name Description
(1,1) Impoverished Management Minimum effort; poor performance and morale
(9,1) Authority-Compliance Maximum production focus; people ignored
(1,9) Country Club Management Maximum people focus; low production
(5,5) Middle-of-the-Road Adequate performance through compromise
(9,9) Team Management Ideal: High commitment to both people and production