Public Section Preview
Behavioural Theories of Leadership
3.1 The Ohio State Studies (1945–1948)
Researchers at Ohio State University (Hemphill, Fleishman) analysed hundreds of leader behaviour descriptions and reduced them to two independent dimensions:
| Dimension | Description | High Scorer Behaviour |
|---|---|---|
| Initiating Structure | Degree to which the leader organises work, assigns tasks, establishes deadlines | Defines roles clearly; high output expectation |
| Consideration | Degree to which the leader shows concern for followers' feelings, mutual trust, and job satisfaction | Supportive; listens to followers; approachable |
Both dimensions are independent — a leader can be high on both (ideal) or low on both.
3.2 University of Michigan Studies (Likert, 1947–1961)
Rensis Likert at Michigan identified two contrasting styles:
- Production-centred leadership: Focus on task completion, technical aspects, and close supervision
- Employee-centred leadership: Focus on relationships, employee development, and participative decision-making
Employee-centred style showed consistently higher productivity, satisfaction, and lower turnover in Michigan studies.
Likert's 4 Systems of Management (1961):
- Exploitative-Authoritative: No trust; fear motivation; top-down
- Benevolent-Authoritative: Some trust; paternalistic; limited participation
- Consultative: Considerable trust; some participation; goals set jointly
- Participative Group: Full trust; team-based; high performance (ideal)
3.3 Blake and Mouton's Managerial Grid (1964)
Robert Blake and Jane Mouton (1964, The Managerial Grid) created a 2-dimensional framework:
X-Axis: Concern for Production (1–9)
Y-Axis: Concern for People (1–9)
| Grid Position | Style Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| (1,1) | Impoverished Management | Minimum effort; poor performance and morale |
| (9,1) | Authority-Compliance | Maximum production focus; people ignored |
| (1,9) | Country Club Management | Maximum people focus; low production |
| (5,5) | Middle-of-the-Road | Adequate performance through compromise |
| (9,9) | Team Management | Ideal: High commitment to both people and production |
