Skip to main content

Polity, Governance and Current Affairs

Distribution of Legislative Powers

Federalism, Centre-State Relations

Paper III · Unit 1 Section 3 of 12 0 PYQs 28 min

Public Section Preview

Distribution of Legislative Powers

2.1 The Seventh Schedule — Three Lists

Union List (List I) — 100 subjects

Subjects on which only Parliament can legislate. Key subjects include:

  • Defence, atomic energy, foreign affairs, war and peace
  • Railways, highways, airways, ports, post & telegraph
  • Currency, banking, insurance, stock exchanges
  • Customs, central taxes (income tax, excise on tobacco, corporation tax)
  • Citizenship, patents, trademarks, copyright
  • IPC, CrPC, Supreme Court jurisdiction, inter-state trade & commerce

State List (List II) — 61 subjects

Subjects on which only State Legislatures can legislate (unless Parliament legislates under Articles 249, 250, 252, 253, or 356). Key subjects include:

  • Public order, police, local government, public health
  • Agriculture, land and land tenures, money lending, fisheries
  • Entertainment tax, taxes on land/buildings, stamp duty
  • State excise, capitation tax, transport on roads

Concurrent List (List III) — 52 subjects

Both Parliament and State Legislatures can legislate. In case of repugnancy, Central law prevails (Article 254), subject to Presidential assent to state law. Key subjects include:

  • Criminal law (IPC, CrPC), civil procedure, marriage and divorce
  • Contracts, bankruptcy, transfer of property
  • Education, forests, wild animals, labour disputes
  • Social security, factories, electricity, drugs

Key note: The 42nd Amendment 1976 shifted 5 subjects from State List to Concurrent List — Education, Forests, Weights & Measures, Protection of Wild Animals & Birds, Administration of Justice in High Courts.

2.2 Residuary Powers — A Unitary Feature

Article 248 gives Parliament exclusive power to legislate on residuary subjects — subjects not covered by any List. This is a key unitary feature. In the USA, residuary powers are with states — India's approach is the opposite.

2.3 Repugnancy — Article 254

When there is conflict between a Central law and a State law on a Concurrent List subject:

  1. The Central law prevails and the state law is void to the extent of repugnancy.
  2. Exception: If the state law was previously enacted and received Presidential assent, it prevails over the central law in that state (until Parliament re-legislates).

The Governor can reserve a state bill for Presidential consideration — the President can give or withhold assent. If the President withholds assent to a state concurrent list bill, the previously enacted central law revives.