Skip to main content

Ethics

Glossary Terms

AI vs. Conscience in Administrative Decision Making

Paper II · Unit 1 Section 12 of 12 0 PYQs 24 min

Public Section Preview

Glossary Terms

Term (EN) Definition Exam Relevance
Artificial Intelligence (AI) Machine systems that simulate human cognitive functions — learning, reasoning, decision-making Core topic term
Machine Learning AI subfield where systems learn from data without being explicitly programmed AI foundations
Algorithm Step-by-step computational procedure; rules AI follows to reach decisions Basis of AI
Algorithmic Bias Systematic unfairness in AI outputs due to biased training data Welfare/policing context
Explainability (XAI) AI system's ability to articulate reasons for its outputs in human-understandable terms Natural justice link
Black-Box AI AI model whose internal workings cannot be interpreted even by its creators Due process violation
Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) Framework requiring human review and approval for AI decisions before effect High-stakes admin
Accountability Gap Diffusion of moral responsibility when AI causes harm across many actors "Problem of many hands"
Predictive Policing Using AI to forecast crime locations/perpetrators based on historical data Civil liberties risk
Conscience Moral faculty enabling judgment of right/wrong, integrating reason and empathy Foundation of ethics
Moral Agent Entity capable of autonomous moral judgment and bearing moral responsibility Kant's concept
Categorical Imperative Kant's principle: act only according to maxims you would universalise Kantian ethics
Phronesis Aristotle's "practical wisdom" — ability to deliberate well in complex situations Virtue ethics
Zweckrationalität Weber: means-end rationality — choosing efficient means to a predetermined end AI's mode of reasoning
Wertrationalität Weber: value rationality — choosing actions based on ethical values, regardless of efficiency Conscience's mode
Algorithmic Impact Assessment Pre-deployment audit of AI for bias, fairness, and rights-risks Canada model, India needed
Natural Justice Legal principle: audi alteram partem (hear both sides) + nemo judex in causa sua XAI requirement
Proportionality Principle that administrative response must be proportionate to the gravity of the issue Conscience vs. algorithm
Compassion Deficit AI's inability to feel empathy for vulnerable citizens Widow pension, drought relief
Exclusion Error AI incorrectly excluding eligible beneficiaries from welfare DBT, Aadhaar example
Responsible AI for All NITI Aayog's 2021 ethical AI framework for India India policy
India AI Mission Rs 10,372 crore programme for AI compute, data, safety (2024) Current affairs
Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023 Act governing data collection and processing in India AI data governance
Dehumanisation Treating citizens as data points, stripping them of rights and dignity AI risk in welfare
Veil of Ignorance Rawls: designing just institutions without knowing one's position in society Fairness in AI design

Sources: NITI Aayog, Responsible AI for All (2021); India AI Mission Policy Documents (2024); Max Weber, Economy and Society; Immanuel Kant, Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals; Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics; John Rawls, A Theory of Justice; Luciano Floridi, The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence; Canada Treasury Board Directive on Automated Decision-Making (2019); RPSC Mains Syllabus 2026; ProPublica COMPAS Study (2016).