Skip to main content

Ethics

AI and Conscience in Rajasthan's Administrative Context

AI vs. Conscience in Administrative Decision Making

Paper II · Unit 1 Section 7 of 12 0 PYQs 24 min

Public Section Preview

AI and Conscience in Rajasthan's Administrative Context

Rajasthan RAS officers will encounter these tensions concretely:

Ration distribution: Jan Aadhar-linked PDS uses algorithmic de-duplication. Exclusion errors in tribal Dungarpur or drought-affected Barmer must trigger officer override, not algorithmic finality.

Revenue administration: e-Dharti and Jan Soochna Portal use automated workflows for land mutation. Conscience is needed when disputes involve tribal land (Section 42, Rajasthan Tenancy Act — alienation restrictions) that an algorithm might process as a routine mutation.

MNREGA wage fraud detection: AI tools identify suspicious patterns (same bank account for many workers). But these patterns can arise from genuine community-level banking arrangements; a conscience-driven officer would investigate before acting.

Drought declaration: While satellite-based NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index) data feeds into drought assessment, the district collector retains the final moral responsibility for declaring drought and triggering relief — this is a conscience-driven decision with massive life-consequences.