Skip to main content

Ethics

Emotional Intelligence and Ethical Administration

Ethics in Public/Private Relationships; Integrity, Impartiality, Non-Partisanship

Paper II ยท Unit 1 Section 8 of 13 0 PYQs 31 min

Public Section Preview

Emotional Intelligence and Ethical Administration

7.1 Why EI Matters for Administrative Ethics

Daniel Goleman's Emotional Intelligence (1995) identifies five components:

Component Definition Administrative Application
Self-Awareness Knowing one's own emotions and biases Recognising when personal feelings may be influencing a decision
Self-Regulation Managing impulses; thinking before acting Not retaliating against a difficult complainant; not approving a report under pressure without reflection
Motivation Intrinsic drive to achieve for internal satisfaction Serving citizens because it is meaningful, not merely for salary/promotion
Empathy Understanding others' emotional states Recognising the desperation behind a citizen's repeated complaints; understanding cultural context
Social Skills Managing relationships constructively Resolving inter-departmental conflicts; engaging community stakeholders without alienating them

7.2 EI and the Ethical Dilemma Framework

High emotional intelligence enables an administrator to:

  1. Pause before reacting to a difficult situation (self-regulation)
  2. Recognise their own emotional state and how it might bias their judgement (self-awareness)
  3. Consider the perspective of all affected parties (empathy)
  4. Apply ethical principles calmly rather than reactively (motivation + social skills)
  5. Act with integrity regardless of the emotional discomfort it causes (courage + regulation)

Low EI leads to ethical failures: An administrator who cannot manage their emotions under pressure is more likely to yield to corruption (fear), show favouritism (personal affection), or make biased decisions (anger at complainant).