Public Section Preview
Emotional Intelligence and Ethical Administration
7.1 Why EI Matters for Administrative Ethics
Daniel Goleman's Emotional Intelligence (1995) identifies five components:
| Component | Definition | Administrative Application |
|---|---|---|
| Self-Awareness | Knowing one's own emotions and biases | Recognising when personal feelings may be influencing a decision |
| Self-Regulation | Managing impulses; thinking before acting | Not retaliating against a difficult complainant; not approving a report under pressure without reflection |
| Motivation | Intrinsic drive to achieve for internal satisfaction | Serving citizens because it is meaningful, not merely for salary/promotion |
| Empathy | Understanding others' emotional states | Recognising the desperation behind a citizen's repeated complaints; understanding cultural context |
| Social Skills | Managing relationships constructively | Resolving inter-departmental conflicts; engaging community stakeholders without alienating them |
7.2 EI and the Ethical Dilemma Framework
High emotional intelligence enables an administrator to:
- Pause before reacting to a difficult situation (self-regulation)
- Recognise their own emotional state and how it might bias their judgement (self-awareness)
- Consider the perspective of all affected parties (empathy)
- Apply ethical principles calmly rather than reactively (motivation + social skills)
- Act with integrity regardless of the emotional discomfort it causes (courage + regulation)
Low EI leads to ethical failures: An administrator who cannot manage their emotions under pressure is more likely to yield to corruption (fear), show favouritism (personal affection), or make biased decisions (anger at complainant).
