8A. Fund Flow Statement vs Cash Flow Statement

Comparison: Fund Flow Statement vs Cash Flow Statement

The distinction between these two statements is a common exam point:

Aspect	Fund Flow Statement	Cash Flow Statement (AS-3)
Basis	Working Capital (Current Assets − Current Liabilities)	Cash and cash equivalents only
Period	Shows changes between two Balance Sheet dates	Shows all cash transactions during a period
Format	Sources of funds and Application of funds	Operating, Investing, Financing activities
Regulator	No specific standard — now largely replaced	AS-3 (ICAI) — mandatory for listed companies
Users	Long-term financial planning	Day-to-day liquidity management
Items included	All long-term and working capital changes	Only actual cash flows
Non-cash items	Excluded from "sources/applications"	Non-cash items adjusted (indirect method)

Why Cash Flow replaced Fund Flow: Fund flow's concept of "funds" = working capital was ambiguous and did not reflect actual cash availability. AS-3 Cash Flow Statement, based on cash and cash equivalents, is more precise and universally comparable.

Direct Method vs Indirect Method — Detailed Comparison

Under AS-3, Cash Flow from Operating Activities can be presented using either method:

Direct Method:

• Lists actual cash receipts from customers
• Lists actual cash payments to suppliers, employees, taxes
• Example entry:
  • Cash received from customers: ₹45,00,000
  • Cash paid to suppliers: ₹(28,00,000)
  • Cash paid to employees: ₹(8,00,000)
  • Income tax paid: ₹(2,50,000)
  • Net cash from operating activities: ₹6,50,000
• ICAI encourages Direct Method for better disclosure.

Indirect Method (more commonly used in practice):

• Starts with Net Profit Before Tax
• Adjusts for non-cash items (depreciation, amortisation, provisions)
• Adjusts for changes in working capital (increase in debtors = cash outflow; increase in creditors = cash inflow)
• Example:
  • Net Profit Before Tax: ₹8,00,000
  • Add: Depreciation: ₹1,50,000
  • Less: Increase in Debtors: ₹(2,00,000)
  • Add: Increase in Creditors: ₹1,00,000
  • Cash from Operations: ₹8,50,000

Value Added Statement

A Value Added Statement is an extension of social/responsibility accounting that shows how a firm creates economic value and distributes it among different stakeholders:

Value Added = Sales Revenue − Cost of bought-in goods and services

Distribution of Value Added:

• Employees — wages, salaries, benefits
• Lenders — interest on loans
• Government — taxes (direct and indirect)
• Shareholders — dividends
• Retained for growth — depreciation + retained profit

Example (hypothetical):

Stakeholder	Amount (₹ lakh)	% of Value Added
Employees	120	45%
Government (taxes)	55	21%
Lenders (interest)	30	11%
Shareholders (dividends)	25	9%
Retained (depreciation + reserves)	35	13%
Total Value Added	265	100%

Value Added Statements are voluntary in India but are increasingly used by large companies for stakeholder reporting (part of social accounting/ESG reporting).

---