Skip to main content

Society, Management and Accounting

Predicted Questions with Model Answers

Caste & Class: Concepts, Changing Dimensions

Paper I · Unit 3 Section 9 of 11 0 PYQs 23 min

Public Section Preview

Predicted Questions with Model Answers

Q1 (5 marks — 50 words): What are the attributes of a dominant caste according to M.N. Srinivas?

Model Answer:

M.N. Srinivas (1959) identified four attributes of a dominant caste: (1) numerical strength in the village; (2) economic dominance through landownership; (3) political influence in local governance; (4) high ritual status in the caste hierarchy. A caste is truly dominant when it possesses all four simultaneously. Examples: Jats (Haryana), Patidars (Gujarat), Rajputs (Rajasthan).

(Word count: 53 — within range)


Q2 (5 marks — 50 words): Distinguish between caste and class with reference to Indian society.

Model Answer:

Caste is birth-ascribed, hereditary, endogamous, and based on ritual purity-pollution hierarchy — rigid and largely unchangeable. Class is achievement-based, economically defined (income, occupation, wealth), open to mobility, and not governed by ritual rules. In India, both overlap: upper-caste Brahmins historically dominated economically; post-Mandal, some OBCs have gained class power while retaining lower ritual rank.

(Word count: 54 — within range)


Q3 (5 marks — 50 words): What is Sanskritisation? What are its limitations?

Model Answer:

Sanskritisation (M.N. Srinivas, 1952) is the process by which lower castes adopt rituals, customs, and diet of higher twice-born castes to gain upward mobility. Limitations: (1) It does not dismantle caste hierarchy — only repositions within it; (2) reinforces Brahminic supremacy as the ideal; (3) Ambedkarite Dalits rejected it, preferring Buddhism and constitutional rights over ritual imitation.

(Word count: 53 — within range)


Q4 (5 marks — 50 words): Explain the Mandal Commission recommendations and their impact on Indian society.

Model Answer:

The Mandal Commission (B.P. Mandal, 1978–80) identified 3,743 OBC castes (~52% of population) and recommended 27% reservation in central government jobs and educational institutions. Implemented in 1990 by V.P. Singh; upheld in Indra Sawhney (1992) with a 50% ceiling. Impact: created an OBC political class; triggered anti-Mandal protests; deepened caste-based political mobilisation permanently.

(Word count: 54 — within range)


Q5 (5 marks — 50 words): What is the difference between vertical and horizontal social mobility? Give examples.

Model Answer:

Vertical mobility = movement up or down the social hierarchy. Upward example: A Dalit youth becoming an IAS officer through reservation. Downward example: A businessman losing his enterprise and wealth. Horizontal mobility = movement between positions of equal social rank. Example: A teacher changing from government to private school at the same pay grade. Both reflect India's gradual shift from ascription to achievement.

(Word count: 54 — within range)


Q6 (5 marks — 50 words): What is the EWS (Economically Weaker Sections) reservation? How is it different from OBC reservation?

Model Answer:

EWS reservation (103rd Constitutional Amendment, January 2019) provides 10% reservation for general category citizens with annual income below ₹8 lakh and agricultural land below 5 acres. Upheld by Supreme Court in Janhit Abhiyan (2022). Difference from OBC: OBC reservation is based on social/educational backwardness (caste-based); EWS is purely economic — SC/ST/OBC are excluded from EWS benefit even if economically poor.

(Word count: 52 — within range)